Commentary

How independent can a CME program be?


 

I appreciate Dr. Henry A. Nasrallah’s editorial examining funding of continuing medical education (CME) programs (“The $1.2 billion CME crisis,” From the Editor, Current Psychiatry, July 2009). CME programs are critical to keep doctors informed about the latest advances and enhance their skills at frequent intervals. In addition, CME programs are important support for primary care physicians who practice in rural areas and work with traditionally underserved populations.

The majority of physicians agree that CME programs meet their educational needs. Pharmaceutical firms often view sponsored CME programs as opportunities to promote their product. It is well known that these companies try to influence the selection of topics and speakers as well as content of CME programs.

I strongly agree with Dr. Nasrallah’s proposal to pool funding from multiple pharmaceutical companies that is then allocated to applicants by a third party. In this manner, CME programs could guarantee the highest level of transparency and scrutiny.

Gurprit Lamba, MD
Third-year resident
St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center
Boston, MA

Recommended Reading

Teen Abuse of ADHD Stimulants Climbed 76%
MDedge Psychiatry
Some Children Outgrow ADHD, Imaging Shows
MDedge Psychiatry
ADHD Drug Use Tied to Higher Math, Reading Scores
MDedge Psychiatry
Teens' Suicidality Risk Differs by Ethnicity
MDedge Psychiatry
Aggressive Intervention Needed for Some Drinkers
MDedge Psychiatry
Saliva Test May Guide Smoking Cessation Treatment
MDedge Psychiatry
Easy Cessation May Be Early Sign of Lung Ca.
MDedge Psychiatry
Pramipexole Acts as Antidepressant in PD
MDedge Psychiatry
Watch Out for Embezzlers
MDedge Psychiatry
How and why it pays to genuinely praise a difficult patient
MDedge Psychiatry