Switching antipsychotics: A balanced approach to ease the transition
With no standards or guidelines, you’re working without a net. Here’s evidence you need to hone your clinical judgment and help patients switch safely.
When switching antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia, you can ease this potentially perilous passage by choosing the right time to switch and preventing psychotic relapse. This article describes four keys to a smooth transition:
- assess response and side effects with the existing medication
- weigh the pros and cons of switching, with input from the patient or caregiver
- select a replacement with characteristics that could improve patient function
- choose a switching strategy while considering safety and efficacy data.
RISKS AND BENEFITS OF SWITCHING
The two most compelling reasons to switch antipsychotics are enhanced clinical response and improved tolerability. Others may include lower medication cost, less-frequent monitoring, fewer drug interactions, or easier administration (such as once-daily versus twice-daily dosing).
Sample response criteria to evaluate an antipsychotic switch
The greatest risk in a relatively stable patient is for psychotic symptoms to re-emerge. Be very careful when switching patients who:
- might harm themselves or others if their psychosis re-emerges during the switch
- were recently stabilized after an acute psychotic episode and have been maintained for less than 6 months on the medication that controlled their symptoms
- cannot adhere to oral medications and are being maintained on long-acting depot formulations.1
Other factors to consider include:
- the need for more-frequent patient visits during the transition to monitor for adverse effects
- the patient’s willingness to switch
- influence of external stressors—such as recent bereavement—or aspects of the patient’s workplace or living environment that may interfere with adherence to a new regimen
- medication cost and coverage by third-party payers.
Establishing specific response criteria for each patient (Table 1) will help you know when to continue or terminate a switch.
Because antipsychotics do not eliminate all positive and negative symptoms, an adequate response is considered a reasonable therapeutic goal. Many patients with schizophrenia respond adequately to traditional or atypical antipsychotics, but approximately one-third do not.2
What is an “adequate” response? No advisory groups or consensus panels have defined this term or set standards for when to switch. Therefore, psychiatrists must evaluate a patient’s response to an antipsychotic by using clinical judgment and patient/caregiver input. To gather the information you need, it is important to:
- identify target symptoms at baseline
- regularly monitor symptom severity, frequency, and intrusion on activities of daily living and quality of life.
Quantitative measures. In research, response is measured as a percent reduction in scores on standard assessments such as the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales (PANSS). Using the PANSS, however, is too time-consuming for clinical practice.
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is simpler than PANSS and can be administered more quickly but is less specific for negative symptoms. Even so, using the BPRS can help quantify baseline symptoms and monitor clinical response. It is useful to complete a BPRS rating prior to a switch and at subsequent visits during the transition. A >20% reduction in the total score is considered an adequate response.
Qualitative measures. Rating scales do not measure patients’ and sfamilies’ subjective feelings. One patient may view a 50% decrease in psychotic symptoms as extremely favorable and another as unacceptable. Switching therefore may be reasonable for one patient but not for another with a similar clinical response.
Treatment-limiting antipsychotic side effects and options for switching
Atypical antipsychotic options
Clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine
Any atypical antipsychotic except risperidone
Pre-existing cardiac dysfunction
Aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone
Aripiprazole, quetiapine, ziprasidone
Aripiprazole, risperidone, ziprasidone
Excessive weight gain
Aripiprazole, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone
Underdosing contributes to inadequate response, so assess whether an antipsychotic has been given a sufficient trial. For example, 400 to 800 mg/d of quetiapine is considered a therapeutic dosage, assuming adequate tolerability, but some clinicians stop increasing the dosage below that range. Similarly, the usual antipsychotic trial continues at least 3 to 4 weeks at a therapeutic dosage.
Antipsychotic side effects that justify switching may be treatment-limiting or simply bothersome. For example, switching is necessary for antipsychotic-induced QTc prolongation in a patient with a history of cardiac dysrhythmias and reasonable for excessive daytime sedation in a patient who is working or attending school.
Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and hyperprolactinemia may limit a patient’s tolerance of an antipsychotic. Patients who are especially sensitive to EPS may not tolerate high-potency agents such an haloperidol or even low to moderate dosages of risperidone. Others may not develop EPS while receiving haloperidol or higher dosages of risperidone.
Switching to an antipsychotic with relatively less histamine or alpha-adrenergic blockade may reduce problematic side effects such as sedation and orthostatic hypotension, respectively (Table 2).
Patients vary in how well they tolerate other side effects, such as weight gain. For example, a 10-lb weight gain may be acceptable to one patient and unacceptable to another. The decision to switch may be more obvious in a patient with diabetes, for whom substantial weight gain is unacceptable.
No method is universally accepted for switching from one antipsychotic to another. In clinical practice and research, three common methods (Figure) are used:
- immediately discontinuing drug A while starting drug B at full dosage
- slowly tapering drug A while starting drug B at full dosage
- slowly tapering drug A while slowly increasing drug B to full dosage.
Each method has advantages and disadvantages. Gradual cross-titration and tapering may reduce the risk of relapse but increase the risk of side effects. Elaborate regimens may confuse some patients—especially those with cognitive impairment—and increase the risk for adverse events and nonadherence.
Abruptly discontinuing an agent is less confusing and more convenient than gradual tapering, but patients may experience acute withdrawal (as with clozapine). Finally, no guidelines exist on how quickly to make the transition when one or both medications are cross-titrated and tapered. For inpatients receiving intense monitoring, a transition may be completed in 3 to 7 days, whereas outpatients may require 1 to 3 weeks.
Recommendation. The evidence cited in the next section of this article suggests that any of the three methods can be used when switching antipsychotics, except clozapine. When switching from clozapine, extend the cross-taper period to help minimize or eliminate rebound psychosis and cholinergic symptoms.
SWITCHING FROM DEPOT TO ORAL AGENTS
For patients switching from depot to oral antipsychotics, a 1-month cross-titration taper has been shown to be efficient and safe.
Godleski et al3 randomized 26 patients who had received IM depot antipsychotics (haloperidol or fluphenazine decanoate) for at least 3 years to either continue the IM depot antipsychotic or switch to olanzapine. Although the study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the switch, it also provided data on the transition method.
Figure 3 common antipsychotic switching strategies
Subjects switching to olanzapine received their routine depot injection plus olanzapine, 10 mg/d for 1 month, followed by olanzapine monotherapy (5 to 20 mg/d) for 2 months. Those who continued IM depot therapy were maintained at a stable dose and dosing interval for 3 months. Safety and efficacy data were collected at baseline and monthly.
Patients receiving olanzapine improved on several efficacy measures, although the clinical relevance was minimal. For example, their mean PANSS total score decreased 3.23 points. One patient—in the control group—was hospitalized. Those who received olanzapine preferred this agent to the IM depot formulations and chose to continue daily olanzapine therapy. Adverse events did not increase significantly while patients received IM depot injections plus olanzapine.
SWITCHING ORAL AGENTS
Clozapine. When risperidone entered the U.S. market in the 1990s, a number of patients who had been treated with clozapine were abruptly switched to risperidone. Many experienced acute symptom exacerbation,4,5 including some whose rebound psychosis was more severe than their original symptoms. Other adverse effects—including nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, headache, restlessness, and sweating— have been attributed to cholinergic rebound caused by abruptly discontinuing clozapine.
To minimize the potential for rebound psychosis and cholinergic symptoms, taper clozapine across a minimum of 1 to 2 weeks. When you need to discontinue clozapine immediately—such as for patients experiencing serious hematologic effects—adding an anticholinergic such as benztropine may minimize the cholinergic rebound.
Risperidone. No studies have formally assessed methods for switching patients to risperidone.
Olanzapine. When switching to olanzapine, a direct switch or cross-titration tapering appear to be viable options.
In one multicenter, open-label study,2 108 patients were randomly assigned to olanzapine, 10 mg/d, after abruptly discontinuing a previous antipsychotic (direct switch) or by cross-titration tapering in a 1:1 fashion. Patients in the crosstitration group started olanzapine and discontinued their original antipsychotics across 2 weeks. Olanzapine dosages were adjusted as needed from 5 to 20 mg/d.
At study entry, approximately 95% of subjects in the direct-switch group and 85% in the crosstitration taper group were taking at least one typical antipsychotic—usually haloperidol. A switch was considered successful if a patient completed the 6-week trial without psychotic symptom worsening or EPS.
The 92 (85%) subjects who completed the study comprised similar percentages from both groups. Their scores on the PANSS total and subscales and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale also were similar.
The most common adverse events were somnolence, insomnia, and headache in the directs-witch group (all 11%), and somnolence (15%), headache (9%), insomnia (7%), and increased appetite (7%) in the cross-titration group. Differences in these percentages were not statistically significant.
EPS and akathisia improved significantly in both groups (p< 0.01) after switching to olanzapine. Thirteen (24%) patients in the direct-switch group and 17 (32%) in the cross-titration taper group required at least one dose of benztropine. Use of concomitant medications was similar.
Quetiapine can be abruptly discontinued with minimal risk of adverse events when initiating another antipsychotic.
Cutler et al6 switched 50 stable patients who had been treated with risperidone, thioridazine, haloperidol, or haloperidol plus benztropine. The original antipsychotics were abruptly discontinued, and quetiapine was initiated in a doseescalating fashion and then maintained at 300 mg/d for 12 days. After that, quetiapine was abruptly discontinued and patients were assessed for side effects, including EPS.
Most patients’ BPRS or CGI-Severity of Illness scores did not change significantly. Two patients (4%) experienced psychotic relapse during the switch. The authors speculated that these relapses might have been related to subtherapeutic quetiapine dosing. Transient nausea and vomiting were reported after quetiapine was discontinued.
Ziprasidone. When switching from another antipsychotic to ziprasidone, all three strategies appear well tolerated and maintain symptom control.
Using randomized, open-label trials, Weiden et al7 investigated strategies for switching patients to ziprasidone from olanzapine, risperidone, and traditional antipsychotics. All participants were diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and had experienced partial or inadequate response or side effects with their original antipsychotics.
Patients were assigned to one of three switching strategies:
- abruptly discontinue the initial antipsychotic
- decrease the initial antipsychotic’s dosage by 50% for 1 week, then discontinue it
- gradually taper the initial antipsychotic, so that subjects received 100% for 3 days of ziprasidone treatment, 50% for the next 4 days, and none thereafter.
For all three strategies, ziprasidone was started at 80 mg/d for 2 days, with dosing adjusted as needed to 40 to 160 mg/d.
All patients’ total score and positive and negative PANSS subscale scores improved significantly (p<0.01) across 6 weeks, although these data represent symptom changes after switching to ziprasidone. No efficacy or safety data were reported during switching. The authors concluded that patients could switch successfully to ziprasidone over a relatively short period using a variety of methods.
In another study, Stip8 switched 54 patients to ziprasidone from haloperidol. All received ziprasidone, 40 mg bid for 2 days and then 80 mg bid. Haloperidol was discontinued: