To Name :
To Email :
From Name :
From Email :
Comments :

Evidence-Based Reviews


Can genetics predict risk for alcohol dependence?

Inherited variations affect response to alcohol and to alcoholism treatments.

Vol. 7, No. 3 / March 2008
This week's quiz:
More »

Children of alcoholics have a 40% to 60% increased risk of developing severe alcohol-related problems1—a harsh legacy recognized for >30 years. Now, as the result of rapidly growing evidence, we can explain in greater detail why alcoholism runs in families when discussing alcohol dependence with patients.

Individuals vary in response to medications and substances of abuse, and genetic research is revealing the heritable origins. Numerous genetic variations are known to influence response to alcohol, as well as alcoholism’s pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and treatment. Pieces are still missing from this complex picture, but investigators are identifying possible risk factors for alcoholism and matching potential responders with treatments such as naltrexone and acamprosate.

This article provides a progress report on contemporary genetic research of alcoholism. Our goal is to inform your clinical practice by describing:

  • new understandings of the genetics of alcoholism
  • how researchers identify relationships between genetic variations and clinical/behavioral phenomena
  • practical implications of this knowledge.

Genetic variations and risk of addiction

No single gene appears to cause alcoholism. Many genetic variations that accumulated during evolution likely contribute to individual differences in response to alcohol and susceptibility to developing alcohol-related problems. A growing number of genetic variations have been associated with increased alcohol tolerance, consumption, and other related phenotypes.

Like other addictive substances, alcohol triggers pharmacodynamic effects by interacting with a variety of molecular targets (Figure 1).2 These target proteins in turn interact with specific signaling proteins and trigger responses in complex functional pathways. Genetic variations may affect the structure of genes coding for proteins that constitute pathways involved in alcohol’s effects on target proteins (pharmacodynamics) or its metabolism (pharmacokinetics). If such variations alter the production, function, or stability of these proteins, the pathway’s function also may be altered and produce behavioral phenotypes—such as high or low sensitivity to alcohol’s effects.

Alcoholism-related phenotypes. DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria include some but not all of the multiple phenotypes within alcoholism’s clinical presentation. Researchers in the Collaborative Studies on Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA)3 identified chromosome regions linked to alcoholism-related phenotypes, including:

  • alcohol dependence4
  • later age of drinking onset and increased harm avoidance5
  • alcoholism and depression6
  • alcohol sensitivity7
  • alcohol consumption.8

To identify genes of interest within these chromosome regions, researchers used transitional phenotypes (endophenotypes) that “lie on the pathway between genes and disease,”9,10 and allowed them to characterize the neural systems affected by gene risk variants.11 As a result, they found associations among variations in the GABRA2 gene, (encoding the alpha-2 subunit of the GABAA receptor), specific brain oscillations (electrophysiologic endophenotype), and predisposition to alcohol dependence.12,13 By this same strategy, researchers discovered an association between the endophenotype (low-level of response to alcohol) and some genotypes, including at least 1 short allele of the serotonin transporter gene SLC6A4.14

Figure 1
Known molecular targets for alcohol and other drugs of abuse



Effects of drugs of abuse (black arrows) influence intracellular signaling pathways (blue arrows) to produce immediate and long-term changes in cell function.
cAMP: cyclic adenosine monophosphate; GABAA: gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor; Gi, Gs, Gq: G proteins (heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins) MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; N-cholino receptor: nicotinic cholinoreceptor; NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate; PKA: protein kinase A
Source: Created for CURRENT PSYCHIATRY from information in reference 2

Alcohol metabolism

Alcohol is metabolized to acetic acid through primary and auxiliary pathways involving alcohol and acetaldehyde dehydrogenases (ADH/ALDH) and the microsomal ethanol oxidizing system (cytochrome P-450 [CYP] 2E1)15 (Figure 2). Auxiliary pathways become involved when the primary pathway is overwhelmed by the amount of alcohol needed to be metabolized. Catalase and fatty acid ethyl ester synthases play a minor role under normal conditions but may be implicated in alcohol-induced organ damage.16

ADH/ALDH pathway. From one individual to another, the ability to metabolize ethyl alcohol varies up to 3- to 4-fold.17 In European and Amerindian samples, a genetic link has been identified between alcoholism and the 4q21-23 region on chromosome 4.18 This region contains a cluster of 7 genes encoding for alcohol dehydrogenases (ADH), including 3 Class I genes—ADH1A, ADH1B, and ADH1C—coding for the corresponding proteins that play a major role in alcohol metabolism.19 In eastern Asian samples, alleles encoding high activity enzymes (ADH1B*47His and ADH1C*349Ile) are significantly less frequent in alcoholics compared with nonalcoholic controls.20

Mitochondrial ALDH2 protein plays the central role in acetaldehyde metabolism and is highly expressed in the liver, stomach, and other tissues—including the brain.21 The ALDH2*2 gene variant encodes for a catalytically inactive enzyme, thus inhibiting acetaldehyde metabolism and causing a facial flushing reaction.22 The ALDH2*2 allele has a relatively high frequency in Asians but also is found in other populations.23 Meta-analyses of published data indicate that possessing either of the variant alleles in the ADH1B and ALDH2 genes is protective against alcohol dependence in Asians.24

The ADH4 enzyme catalyzes oxidation or reduction of numerous substrates—including long-chain aliphatic alcohols and aromatic aldehydes—and becomes involved in alcohol metabolism at moderate to high concentrations. The -75A allele of the ADH4 gene has promoter activity more than twice that of the -75C allele and significantly affects its expression.25 This substitution in the promoter region, as well as A/G SNP (rs1042364)—a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)—at exon 9, has been associated with an increased risk for alcohol and drug dependence in European Americans.26

Finally, variations in the ADH7 gene may play a protective role against alcoholism through epistatic effects.27

The CYP 2E1 pathway has low initial catalytic efficiency compared with the ADH/ALDH pathway, but it may metabolize alcohol up to 10 times faster after chronic alcohol consumption or cigarette smoking and accounts for metabolic tolerance.28 CYP 2E1 is involved in metabolizing both alcohol and acetaldehyde.29 The CYP 2E1*1D polymorphism has been associated with greater inducibility as well as alcohol and nicotine dependence.30

Thus, linkage and association studies support the association of phenotypes related to alcohol response and dependence with variations in genes that code for proteins involved in alcohol’s pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects. Each of these findings is important, but conceptual models organizing them all and explaining their role in alcohol’s effects and predisposition to alcoholism have yet to be constructed.

Figure 2
Genetic variations that affect alcohol metabolism pathways



Genetic variations affect the efficiency of primary and auxiliary pathways by which ethyl alcohol is metabolized to acetaldehyde and acetic acid. Auxiliary pathways become involved when the primary pathway is overwhelmed by the amount of alcohol to be metabolized.
ADH: alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH: acetaldehyde dehydrogenase; P450CYP 2E1: cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily E, polypeptide 1; A/G SNP: adenine/guanine single nucleotide polymorphism

Phenotype-genotype relationships

Alcohol—unlike most other addictive substances—does not have a specific receptor and is believed to act by disturbing the balance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in the neural system. Consequently, researchers explore relationships between genetics and alcohol-related problems using 2 approaches:

  • Forward genetics (discovering disease-related genes via genome-wide studies and then studying their function; examples include linkage and genome-wide association studies [GWAS]).
  • Reverse genetics (testing whether candidate genes and polymorphisms identified in animal studies as relevant for biological effects also exist in humans and are relevant to the phenotype).31

When searching for relationships between genotypes and phenotypes, both approaches must take into account a framework of functional anatomic and physiologic connections (Figure 3).

Linkage studies. The goal of linkage studies is to find a link between a phenotypic variation (ideally a measurable trait, such as number of drinks necessary for intoxication) and the chromosomal marker expected to be in the vicinity of the disease-specific gene variation. An advantage of linkage studies is that they can be started without knowing specific DNA sequences. Their limitations include:

  • limited power when applied to complex diseases such as alcoholism
  • they do not yield gene-specific information
  • their success is highly dependent on family members’ willingness to participate.

Association studies. Candidate gene-based association studies are designed to directly test a potential association between the phenotype of interest and a known genomic sequence variation. This approach provides adequate power to study variations with modest effects and allows use of DNA from unrelated individuals. The candidate gene approach has revealed associations between specific genomic variations and phenotypes related to alcohol misuse and alcoholism (Table).

Like linkage studies, association studies have their own challenges and limitations, such as:

  • historically high false-positive rates
  • confounding risks (allele frequencies may vary because of ethnic stratification rather than disease predisposition).

To address these challenges, researchers must carefully choose behavioral, physiologic, or intermediate phenotypes and genotype variations, as well as control subjects and sample sizes. Replication studies are necessary to rule out false-positive associations. In fact, only some of the findings depicted in the Table—those related to GABRA2 and GABRA6 and few other genes—have been replicated.

Genome-wide association studies are a powerful new method for studying relationships between genomic variability and behavior. With GWAS, thousands of DNA samples can be scanned for thousands of SNPs throughout the human genome, with the goal of identifying variations that modestly increase the risk of developing common diseases.

Unlike the candidate gene approach—which focuses on preselected genomic variations—GWAS scans the whole genome and may identify unexpected susceptibility factors. Unlike the family-based linkage approach, GWAS is not limited to specific families and can address all recombination events in a population.

Challenges are associated with GWAS, however, and include:

  • need for substantial numbers (2,000 to 5,000) of rigorously described cases and matched controls
  • need for accurate, high-throughput genotyping technologies and sophisticated algorithms for analyzing data
  • risk of high false-positive rates related to multiple testing
  • inability to scan 100% of the genome, which may lead to false-negative findings.

Table

Examples of gene variations related to alcohol misuse and alcoholism phenotypes

Phenotype

Gene variation(s)

Related to alcohol misuse

Low response/high tolerance to alcohol

L allele of serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) and Ser385 allele of alpha-6 subunit of GABAA receptor gene (GABRA6) in adolescents and healthy adult men;a,b 600G allele of alpha-2 subunit of GABAA receptor gene (GABRA2) in healthy social drinkersc

Cue-related craving for alcohol

118G allele of opioid μ-receptor gene (OMPR) and L allele of dopamine receptor type 4 gene (DRD4) in young problem drinkersd,e

Binge drinking

S allele of serotonin transporter gene in college students; combination of SS genotype of serotonin transporter gene and HH genotype of MAOA gene in young womenf

Related to alcoholism

Alcohol dependence

Two common haplotypes of GABRA2 geneg

Liver cirrhosis in alcoholics

-238A allele of tumor necrosis factor gene (TNFA)h

Protects against withdrawal symptoms in alcoholics

-141C Del variant of the dopamine receptor type 2 gene (DRD2)i

Associated with delirium tremens

8 genetic polymorphisms in 3 candidate genes involved in the dopamine transmission (DRD2, DRD3, and SLC6A3), 1 gene involved in the glutamate pathway (GRIK3), 1 neuropeptide gene (BDNF), and 1 cannabinoid gene (CNR1)j

Associated with alcohol withdrawal seizures

9 repeat allele of dopamine transporter (SLC6A3); 10 repeat allele of tyrosine hydroxylase gene (TH); Ser9 allele of dopamine receptor type 3 gene (DRD3); SS genotype of serotonin transporter gene; 2108A allele in NR1 subunit of NMDA receptor gene (GRIN1)k-m

GABAA: gamma-aminobutyric acid A; MAOA: monoamine oxidase A; NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate

Source: Click here to view references

Figure 3
2 ways to seek relationships between genes and behavior



Researchers use ‘forward’ and ‘reverse’ genetics to connect behavioral phenotypes with predisposing genotypes. Each approach must consider intermediary functional anatomic and physiologic levels (black box), as shown in this conceptual framework.
DA: dopamine; EEG: electroencephalography; 5-HT: serotonin; LTD: long-term depression; LTP: long-term potentiation; RNA: ribonucleic acid; SNPs: single nucleotide polymorphisms; VNTRs: variable number tandem (triplet) repeats

Clinical implications

Genomic research is increasing our understanding of alcohol’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions and of potential genetic associations with alcoholic phenotypes. These insights may lead to discovery of new therapies to compensate for specific physiologic and behavioral dysfunctions. For example, medications with pharmacologic profiles complimentary to addiction-related physiologic/behavioral deficits might be designed in the future.

Continued...
Did you miss this content?
Prescriber’s guide to using 3 new antidepressants: Vilazodone, levomilnacipran, vortioxetine