To Name :
To Email :
From Name :
From Email :
Comments :

Evidence-Based Reviews


Stalking intervention: Know the 5 stalker types, safety strategies for victims

Vol. 6, No. 5 / May 2007

A patient, a colleague, or perhaps you have been stalked. The chances of a woman being stalked are an estimated 1 in 14; for men, it is 1 in 50.1 Fearful stalking victims may restrict their lives, change jobs, and curtail social activities to protect themselves from unwanted attention, physical assault, or even murder. They may develop anxiety, depression, or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).2,3

Historical, clinical, and behavioral factors increase a stalker’s risk for committing violence (Table 1).2-7 As a psychiatrist, you may be asked to consult with local law enforcement and stalking victims to assess and manage victims’ risk. To best protect them, be aware of:

  • 5 types of stalkers and their typical response to management strategies
  • legal and safety issues to consider before taking actions that might endanger stalking victims
  • strategies to help victims protect themselves
  • interventions for victims and stalkers.

Table 1

Factors that increase the risk of violence

Factor type

Features

Historical

Ex-intimate partner

Previous violence

Criminal record (especially violent crimes)

Previous threats (especially specific or face-to-face)

Clinical

“Rejected” or “predatory” stalker type

Substance use

Narcissism, entitlement

Personality disorder with anger or behavioral instability

Depression with suicidal ideas

Behavioral

Access to weapons

Proximity to victim

Victim in a new relationship

Has already taken actions on plans/threats

Researching the victim

Unconcerned with negative consequences

Risk factors for homicide or serious physical harm:

  • Previous visits to victim’s home
  • Previous violence during stalking
  • Threats to harm victim’s children
  • Places notes on victim’s car

Source: References 2-7

Stalker types

Mullen et al8 developed a clinically oriented, validated stalker classification system to identify an individual stalker’s type, risks, and probable responses to management interventions (Table 2).

Rejected stalkers—the most common and dangerous type—pursue the victim, often a former intimate partner, after a relationship ends. They often acknowledge a complex and volatile mix of desire for reconciliation and revenge. These stalkers likely have a history of criminal assault.

Rejected stalkers appear to respond best to a combination of coordinated legal sanctions and mental health intervention. Because they are most likely to be violent, rejected stalkers need intensive probation or parole supervision.5

Intimacy-seeking stalkers want an intimate relationship with a victim they believe is their “true love” and tend to imbue their victims with special desirability, excellence, and other qualities consistent with their belief of romanticized love. Most have erotomanic delusions, and the rest have morbid infatuations with the victim. Intimacy-seeking stalkers typically are unperturbed by legal sanctions, viewing them as the price to pay for “true love.” They often require court-mandated psychiatric treatment.

Incompetent stalkers know the victim is disinterested but forge ahead in hopes that their behavior will lead to a relationship. Their stalking can be viewed as crude or “incompetent” attempts to court the victim. Incompetent stalkers often are intellectually limited; they feel entitled to a partner but because of underdeveloped social skills are unable to build upon lesser forms of social interaction. Unlike intimacy-seekers, incompetent stalkers do not endow the victim with unique qualities.

In addition to needing legal sanctions and possible mental health treatment, incompetent stalkers often require social skills training. Otherwise, they are likely to continue their pattern of stalking with other victims.

Resentful stalkers intend to frighten and distress the victim. Many have paranoid personalities or delusional disorders. They may pursue a vendetta against a specific victim or feel generally aggrieved and randomly choose a victim. They often feel persecuted and may go about stalking with an attitude of righteous indignation.

Resentful stalkers who suffer from mental illness generally require court-ordered psychiatric treatment but are difficult to engage in therapy. Legal sanctions may inflame this type of stalker.

Predatory stalkers prepare for a sexual assault. They stalk to discover the victim’s vulnerabilities and seldom give warnings, so the victim is often unaware of the danger.

Predatory stalkers frequently suffer from paraphilias and have prior convictions for sexual offenses. They must be secured in a correctional or forensic setting to address their paraphilias and propensity for violence.

Table 2

Identifying types of stalkers

Type

Traits and behaviors

Rejected

Pursues former intimate partner

Desires reconciliation and/or revenge

Criminal assault history

Personality disorders predominate

Intimacy-seeking

Desires relationship with “true love”

Oblivious to victim response

Most have erotomanic delusions

Endows victim with unique qualities

Incompetent

Acknowledges victim’s disinterest

Hopes behavior leads to intimacy

Does not endow victim with unique qualities

Low IQ, socially inept, entitled

Resentful

Feels persecuted and desires retribution

Intends to frighten or distress

Specific or general grievance

Paranoid diagnoses

Predatory

Preparing for sexual attack

Stalks to study and observe

Paraphilias, prior sexual offenses are common

No warnings before attack

Source: Reference 8

Managing victims’ risk

Effectively managing a victim’s stalking risk is a dynamic process. It is critical to use professional judgment in a flexible manner and to work as a team with professionals from other agencies (Box).9-12

Intervention dilemma. Before taking any action, consider that taking direct measures against the stalker to reduce stalking may increase the risk of violence.10 A law enforcement intervention may provoke a stalker by challenging or humiliating him or her. Therefore, there is no single best approach to risk management. Consider the significance of individual-specific nuances, and solicit input from different disciplines. In some cases, no direct action may be preferable.

Protective orders. Obtaining a protective order may or may not be helpful. Most domestic violence research indicates that such orders protect abused women.13 This is important because stalking by a former intimate partner often occurs in relationships characterized by domestic violence.14 In addition to potentially preventing stalking behavior, a protective order may provide legal evidence of the course of stalking, as well as document a “fearful victim,” which is required by law to obtain a criminal conviction.

No conclusive studies have investigated the effectiveness of protective orders specifically related to stalkers, so consider the stalker’s reaction to previous orders.15 Counsel a victim who obtains a protective order against a former intimate partner to avoid developing a false sense of security. Rejected stalkers who have considerable emotional investment in the relationship may not be deterred by the threat of criminal sanctions. Furthermore, stalkers who are psychotic may misperceive and disregard criminal injunctions. In rare cases, a protective order may escalate stalking and violence.15

Dramatic moments. Advise a victim to remain vigilant during “dramatic moments” when violence risk may be especially heightened.15 These include:

  • arrests
  • issuance of protective orders
  • court hearings
  • custody hearings
  • anniversary dates
  • family-oriented holidays.

Legal intercessions—such as receiving a protective order, being arrested, or appearing in court—may cause the stalker intense humiliation or narcissistic injury. A victim might be at greatest risk immediately after such events because the stalker may feel humiliated but retains his or her freedom.

Encourage a victim who is especially concerned about an impending dramatic moment to prepare by:

  • arranging to be out of town on that date
  • notifying law enforcement and victim advocates.

Box

Anti-stalking teams: an effective approach

A multidisciplinary approach is the most effective way to reduce stalking violence risk. In addition to mental health professionals, an effective team usually includes law enforcement and criminal justice personnel, attorneys, security specialists/private investigators, victim advocates, and the victim and his or her social network.

The victim can increase the chances that officials will view his or her case as a priority by establishing rapport with the senior police official and district attorney assigned to the case.10,11 Such rapport also allows the victim to learn about the laws and resources available for managing stalking risk.

A multidisciplinary team can assess and manage risk, provide education, and support victims. One well-established anti-stalking team—the San Diego Stalking Strike Force—meets monthly to evaluate cases.12 Members also are on-call for emergencies. By exchanging information monthly, the case manager and parole agent enhance stalker supervision.

In court, advocacy is critical. The consultant psychiatrist or victim advocate can educate the court that stalking is not a “lovers’ spat” (in the case of the rejected stalker) or mere nuisance behavior (in the case of other stalker types). The victim and psychiatrist may need to mobilize resources and promote collaboration among professionals in communities that do not have advocates or anti-stalking services.

Treating victims’ symptoms

As a result of the risks they face, stalking victims often suffer significant “social damage.” To cope with being stalked, many victims must make substantial life changes, such as relocating or finding new employment. They may need to restrict outings, adapt security measures, and take time off from work.16 This social damage and anxiety may predispose them to substance abuse.17

Stalking victims also experience emotional distress.3,18 They commonly report symptoms of anxiety disorders, in particular PTSD, and one-quarter experience depression and suicidal ruminations.19 Victims who perceive their stalking as severe report elevated levels of helplessness, anxiety, PTSD, and depression.20

Few studies focus on the duration of victims’ symptoms or their successful treatment.21 Mullen8 has recommended a comprehensive approach that includes education, supportive counseling, psychotherapy, and pharmacotherapy. In particular, cognitive-oriented therapy can target common issues such as anxiety leading to feelings of loss of control and associated avoidance. Pharmacotherapy for anxiety or depressive symptoms follows recommended treatment guidelines.

Because the stalking and associated stress may have an adverse impact on the victim’s personal relationships, partner and family therapy may be necessary. Support organizations for stalking victims, such as Survivors of Stalking, can provide education, safety information, and emotional support.

Improving victims’ safety

Coach a victim to take responsibility for his or her safety by becoming familiar with local stalking laws, resources, and law enforcement policies.13,22 Emphasize that a victim must be assertive to ensure that safety measures are in place (Table 3).3,8,10,15,18

As soon as unwanted pursuit is apparent, the victim should unequivocally tell the stalker that no relationship is wanted.8 This message must be firm, reasonable, and as clear as possible. The victim should not attempt to deliver the message gently or let the stalker “down easy.” Otherwise, the stalker may believe the victim is ambivalent about the decision and will continue or redouble his or her efforts.

After delivering this message, the victim should not engage in any further discussion or initiate contact with the stalker. The victim must avoid all contact to minimize the effects of “intermittent positive reinforcement.”15

The victim should document and preserve evidence by recording the dates and times of each unwanted contact, including vandalism, in an “incident log” or journal. Encourage him or her to photograph and note the date of any property damage. This documentation will help establish a clear course of illegal conduct and can prove invaluable to police and prosecution efforts.

The victim should preserve any evidence—including gifts, mementos, and other materials—by placing it in a plastic bag labeled with the date, time, and place it was received. Encourage the victim to:

  • resist the urge to discard evidence that may evoke feelings of fear, shame, or disgust
  • avoid handling evidence, and store it in a secure location.

Teach a victim to protect his or her address, phone numbers, email address, and other personal information by disclosing it only to trusted persons. He or she could:

  • establish a post office box to prevent someone from stealing mail containing personal information
  • shred personal mail instead of placing it in the trash.

Encourage the victim to have a frank discussion with law enforcement personnel about how much assistance can be expected. Hiring a private investigator who is familiar with personal protection and stalking might be worthwhile after law enforcement officials document the stalking behavior.

It is essential for the victim to form a network of trusted social contacts who will provide a “safety net.” Informing family, friends, co-workers, and neighbors about stalking and its potentially serious consequences may reduce the risk that they might inadvertently disclose a victim’s personal information to the stalker.8 The victim can distribute a photo of the stalker to members of the safety network, as well as co-workers, with instructions to call the victim if the stalker is spotted.

Security experts often advise victims not to adhere to their usual, predictable routines by, for example, taking different daily travel routes or being prepared to go out of town at short notice.2 Victims should also make contingency plans in case their social supports are unavailable in an emergency. Victim advocacy agents can give information about services and locations of local “safe houses” or domestic violence shelters.

Continued...
Did you miss this content?
What do >700 letters to a mass murderer tell us about the people who wrote them?