To Name :
To Email :
From Name :
From Email :
Comments :

Evidence-Based Reviews


Antipsychotics for patients without psychosis?

What clinical trials support

Vol. 5, No. 12 / December 2006
This week's quiz:
More »

Controlled clinical trial results can help you make two prescribing decisions:

  • Is an antipsychotic the right choice for this patient?
  • If yes, which agent?

Prescribing antipsychotics off-label can be worthwhile when a patient gets better, but even then two worries remain:

  • Most uses of antipsychotics for nonpsychotic illness are not evidence-based.
  • This practice may expose clinicians to liability if the patient gets worse.

Consider the use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) to manage acute behaviors in patients with dementia. The FDA ordered a black box warning in 2005 that SGAs may increase mortality risk in older patients. In October, the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness-Alzheimer’s Disease (CATIE-AD) reported that SGAs’ side effects offset their benefits when compared with placebo (see Will CATIE-AD change dementia treatment?).1

What do you do when FDA-approved drugs fail to help your patient with dementia, unipolar depression, anxiety disorders, or other nonpsychotic symptoms, and SGAs may be the next consideration? The answers lie in managing side effects and knowing which antipsychotic uses are supported by data from controlled clinical trials, which we review here.

Box 1

Why SGAs are widely used in nonpsychotic disorders

  • FGAs showed efficacy for nonpsychotic disorders
  • SGAs are associated with a lower risk of EPS and tardive dyskinesia at therapeutic dosages, compared with FGAs
  • Many patients fail to respond adequately to medications approved for their illnesses
  • Evidence on SGAs’ efficacy in nonpsychotic disorders has grown substantially in the past 10 years.

EPS: extrapyramidal symptoms

FGA: first-generation antipsychotic

SGA: second-generation antipsychotic

Prescribing considerations

For a variety of reasons (Box 1), SGAs have rapidly assumed a major role in treating nonpsychotic disorders. Thirty-one percent of psychotropics are dispensed off-label,2 and Buckley3 reported in a 3-state survey that 70% of SGA prescriptions were written for indications other than schizophrenia.

Using antipsychotics for nonpsychotic symptoms is a longstanding clinical practice. In schizophrenia patients, antipsychotics have been shown to improve psychotic and nonpsychotic symptoms: agitation, violence, negative symptoms, social isolation, depression, suicidality, anxiety, insomnia, poor appetite, compulsions, cognition, smoking, alcohol and drug use, polydipsia, tardive dyskinesia, and tardive dystonia. Some clinicians may view these reports as evidence that antipsychotics might relieve these symptoms in patients with nonpsychotic disorders as well, but the issue is more complicated than that (Box 2).4

Caveats. SGAs do offer clinicians unique tools; no other class of psychotropics can claim efficacy in psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, depression, and other disorders we describe in this review. On the other hand:

  • Although some SGAs are approved for bipolar disorder and one was recently approved to treat irritability in autism (Table 1), most SGA uses in nonpsychotic disorders are off-label and supported by few—if any—large, randomized, controlled trials.
  • Antipsychotics can cause the very symptoms they relieve, including depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), anxiety, poorer cognition, agitation, mania, insomnia, and abnormal movements.
  • Few controlled studies have compared SGAs to usual first-line treatments; most have evaluated SGAs as adjuncts to other psychotropics—such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs)—for patients with treatment-resistant disorders.
  • Published head-to-head studies have rarely compared the efficacy of various SGAs in treating nonpsychotic disorders.
  • Long-term safety studies of SGAs for nonpsychotic indications have not been done.

Among the SGAs, more studies of risperidone and olanzapine have been done in nonpsychiatric disorders, compared with quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole. Clozapine has shown positive effects in mania, aggressiveness. and tardive dyskinesia, but few controlled studies of off-label uses have been done because of clozapine’s risk of agranulocytosis.

Table 1

Bipolar and other nonpsychotic indications FDA-approved for SGAs

SGA

Bipolar mania

Bipolar depression

Bipolar maintenance

Other

Aripiprazole

Acute mania or mixed episodes

 

Bipolar I disorder, most recent episode manic or mixed

 

Clozapine

 

 

 

Risk of recurrent suicidal behavior in schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders

Olanzapine

Acute mania or mixed episodes; monotherapy or with lithium or valproate for manic episodes

 

Bipolar disorder maintenance monotherapy

 

Olanzapine/fluoxetine combination

 

Bipolar depressive episodes

 

 

Quetiapine

Acute manic episodes; monotherapy or with lithium or valproate

Bipolar depressive episodes

 

 

Risperidone

Acute mania or mixed episodes; monotherapy or with lithium or valproate

 

 

Irritability in autism

Ziprasidone

Acute manic or mixed episodes

 

 

 

SGA: second-generation antipsychotic (oral forms)

Safety issues. SGAs’ safety profiles warrant caution. SGAs are less likely than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) to cause extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and tardive dyskinesia at therapeutic dosages, but they increase the risks of weight gain, diabetes, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and hyperprolactinemia. Akathisia and hypotension also may occur.

Prescribing decisions. SGA’s potential adverse effects complicate clinical decision-making. First you must decide whether to use an SGA for your patient with a nonpsychotic disorder.

Box 2

How do antipsychotics work in nonpsychotic illness?

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) show efficacy in so many psychotic and nonpsychotic disorders that a specific therapeutic action for each disorder is highly doubtful. One might ask, then: What do they improve, and how do they do it?

The complete answer is beyond current understanding, unfortunately. We do know, however, that SGAs have not shown efficacy for treating nonpsychotic disorders that first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) did not show—except perhaps for maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder.

Calming action. The major clinical action of SGAs appears to be in calming patients, which also was the first therapeutic effect attributed to the FGA chlorpromazine. This calming effect would explain SGAs’ efficacy in treating agitation, aggressiveness, anxiety, and possibly mania. Other clinical effects specific to psychosis and possibly to depression are possible.

Receptor-blocking action. SGAs’ D2 and 5-HT2A receptor-blocking activity may explain much of the drugs’ therapeutic effect. However, if SGAs’ effect on nonpsychotic symptoms derives from their action on nondopaminergic receptors, then individual SGAs would vary widely in efficacy and pure dopaminergic agents such as amisulpride would be ineffective.

SGAs also bind at other receptor sites, and the clinical importance of this may vary from patient to patient, drug to drug, and dose to dose.4

Knowing, for example, that antipsychotics have been shown to increase mortality and cerebrovascular events in older patients might make you less likely to prescribe an SGA for a patient with dementia-related agitation. No other pharmacologic treatment has shown clear efficacy for these patients, however, so other factors are important to consider, including:

  • patient history and clinical characteristics
  • potential side effects
  • individual therapeutic response to previous medications.

If you decide to use an SGA, you then must choose among the available agents. Because head-to-head comparisons are lacking, consider data that exist for your patients’ nonpsychotic indications (Table 1 and Table 2).

Table 2

SGA uses in nonpsychotic disorders supported by evidence
from published double-blind clinical trials*

SGA

Unipolar depression

OCD

Anxiety disorders

Dementia

Developmental disorders

Borderline personality disorder

Aripiprazole

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

Clozapine

 

 

 

 

 

 

Olanzapine

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Quetiapine

 

Yes

 

 

 

 

Risperidone

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 

Ziprasidone

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Not including studies of bipolar disorder

OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder

SGA: second-generation antipsychotic

Dementia

Most Alzheimer’s patients—75% to 90%—experience behavioral problems during this progressive dementia. Double-blind studies have found risperidone (mean dosage ~1 mg/d) and olanzapine (mean dosage 5 to 10 mg/d) effective in reducing agitation and aggression, even in nonpsychotic patients with Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia.5,6 Quetiapine, ≤100 mg/d, was not more effective than placebo in reducing agitation.7 One study comparing IM olanzapine with IM lorazepam and placebo in acute agitation found both active treatments more effective than placebo.8

CATIE-AD—sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health—compared olanzapine, risperidone, and quetiapine with placebo in 421 outpatients with behavioral symptoms such as psychosis, agitation, or aggressiveness.1 No significant differences were seen in overall effectiveness (measured as discontinuation for any cause9), although patients receiving olanzapine (mean dosage 5.5 mg/d) or risperidone (mean dosage 1 mg/d) had lower discontinuation rates for lack of efficacy than those receiving placebo.

Unfortunately, the results of the first phase of CATIE-AD provide no clear guidance on the therapeutic strategy to use in dementia. Its findings do suggest two secondary conclusions, however, about using SGAs for patients with dementia:

  • Because quetiapine, mean dosage 56.5 mg/d, was not more effective than placebo on any measures, consider higher dosages when using this agent.
  • Close attention to preventing and treating SGAs’ side effects is the key to effectively treating agitation and psychosis in dementia.

Other studies. In addition to common side effects observed with SGAs, controlled data suggest that olanzapine and quetiapine can worsen cognition in older patients with dementia.7,10 SGAs—as well as FGAs—also have been associated with increased risk of cerebrovascular events (stroke and transient ischemic attacks) and mortality in this population.11,12

Recommendation. Nonpharmacologic interventions are an important part of treating behavioral problems in patients with dementia.13,14 Antipsychotics—particularly SGAs—have shown efficacy for psychosis and agitation in these patients and remain the first therapeutic option. The CATIE-AD investigators recommend that clinicians evaluate potential risks and benefits of pharmacotherapy and discuss these with patients and caregivers.1 Also:

  • Consider which SGAs have the lowest risk of causing side effects for an individual patient.
  • Start with low dosages and increase as needed, based on efficacy and tolerability.

Bipolar disorder

Acute mania. Five SGAs—aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone—are FDA-approved for acute mania (Table 1). Large double-blind studies supporting this indication show that SGAs have efficacy in treating mania as monotherapy and in combination with lithium or divalproex.15 These clinical trials included patients who were not psychotic at baseline.

Antipsychotic dosages in these studies were within the ranges used in schizophrenia treatment studies. Combining an SGA with lithium or divalproex generally yields greater reductions in mania rating scale scores, higher response rates, and higher remission rates than using lithium or divalproex alone. No published study has compared SGAs with each other in mania, but differences in efficacy among these compounds are likely to be small.16

Bipolar depression. SGAs’ efficacy in bipolar depression has been evaluated in double-blind studies, and quetiapine and the olanzapine/fluoxetine combination are FDA-approved for this indication.

Olanzapine plus fluoxetine was more effective in improving depressive symptoms than olanzapine alone in a double-blind study of 833 adults with depressive symptoms of bipolar I disorder, as measured by Montgomery-Åsburg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. Olanzapine alone was more effective than placebo. Mean dosages were olanzapine, 7.4 mg/d, and fluoxetine, 39.3 mg/d, in combination therapy and olanzapine, 9.7 mg/d, as monotherapy.

MADRS scores indicated that combination therapy—but not olanzapine alone—improved core depressive symptoms such as sadness, lassitude, inability to feel, and pessimistic thoughts.17

Quetiapine. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (BOLDER I) evaluated quetiapine in 542 outpatients experiencing a major depressive episode associated with bipolar I or II disorder. After 8 weeks, quetiapine at 300 or 600 mg/d was more effective than placebo in reducing depressive symptoms, as measured by MADRS score changes.

Response rates were 58% with quetiapine and 36% with placebo; remission rates were 53% with quetiapine and 28% with placebo. Most symptoms, including core depression items, improved significantly with quetiapine, compared with placebo.18 Results of a second double-blind study (BOLDER II) have been presented at conferences but have not been fully published.

Risperidone. A smaller double-blind study compared risperidone plus placebo, paroxetine plus placebo, and risperidone plus paroxetine in 30 patients in the depressed phase of bipolar I or II disorder. Patients continued taking mood stabilizers during the study. After 12 weeks, depressive symptoms improved significantly in all three groups, with no significant differences.19

Maintenance therapy. Olanzapine and aripiprazole are FDA-approved for maintenance therapy in bipolar disorder (Table 1).

Unipolar depression

FGAs have shown efficacy in depression in multiple controlled studies.20 SGAs have been evaluated mostly as add-on therapies in antidepressant-resistant depression.

Olanzapine. Shelton et al21 compared olanzapine monotherapy, fluoxetine monotherapy, and combined treatment in 34 nonpsychotic, treatment-resistant depressed subjects. Olanzapine plus fluoxetine was more effective than either agent alone. A subsequent double-blind study, however, showed similar efficacy after 8 weeks among the three treatments and nortriptyline monotherapy. Patients in the double-blind trial appeared to respond more rapidly to combined treatment than to the monotherapies.22

Risperidone. A multiphase study of the efficacy of risperidone augmentation in treatment-resistant major depression began when 489 outpatients (2% with psychotic symptoms) received open-label citalopram, 20 to 60 mg/d. After 4 to 6 weeks, 386 nonresponders entered the augmentation phase with open-label risperidone, 0.25 to 2 mg/d. After 4 to 6 weeks of combination therapy, 241 (63%) patients whose symptoms resolved entered a double-blind discontinuation phase, in which they were randomly assigned to augmentation with risperidone or placebo, while on citalopram.

Continued...
Did you miss this content?
What to tell your bipolar disorder patient who wants to breast-feed