To Name :
To Email :
From Name :
From Email :
Comments :

Evidence-Based Reviews

Update on eating disorders Bulimia nervosa: Persistent disorder requires equally persistent treatment

If a first antidepressant trial fails, most patients can achieve remission with other medications plus simple supportive psychotherapy.

Vol. 3, No. 1 / January 2004

Thousands of scientific papers have been written about bulimia, but not all patients receive effective treatments that produce remission.

To set the record straight and help psychiatrists avoid undertreating bulimia, this article discusses:

  • evidence for using antidepressants, even when patients are not “depressed”
  • merits of psychotherapies, including those shown to work and those that can harm
  • augmentation therapies that can help increase response from partial to full remission.

Initial evaluation

Diagnosis. Bulimia nervosa is characterized by eating binges, followed by purging behaviors such as self-induced vomiting or laxative abuse 1,2 (Table 1). It affects 1% to 3% of adolescent girls and young women and occurs in women 5 to 10 times more often than in men.

Bulimia is often persistent. About one-half of bulimic patients—including those who have been treated—continue to show eating disorder features on long-term follow-up. 3,4

Psychiatric comorbidity. Most bulimic patients report a history of other psychiatric disorders, especially major depressive and bipolar disorders and anxiety disorders such as panic disorder, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).5 Because these psychiatric comorbidities may occur before, during, or after bulimia nervosa, one cannot assume that mood or anxiety disorders are a cause or consequence of bulimia. Instead, bulimia nervosa, mood disorders, and anxiety disorders may be different expressions of a shared etiologic abnormality.

Table 1

DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa

  1. Recurrent episodes of binge eating, characterized by both of the following:
  2. Recurrent inappropriate compensatory behavior in order to prevent weight gain, such as self-induced vomiting; misuse of laxatives, diuretics, enemas, or other medications; fasting; or excessive exercise
  3. The binge eating and inappropriate compensatory behaviors both occur, on average, at least twice a week for 3 months
  4. Self-evaluation is unduly influenced by body shape and weight
  5. The disturbance does not occur exclusively during episodes of anorexia nervosa

Specify type:

Purging type: during the current episode of bulimia nervosa, the person has regularly engaged in self-induced vomiting or the misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or enemas

Non-purging type: during the current episode of bulimia nervosa, the person has used other inappropriate compensatory behaviors, such as fasting or excessive exercise but has not regularly engaged in self-induced vomiting or the misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or enemas

Source: Reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Copyright 2000 American Psychiatric Association.

Evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from studies showing that these disorders:

  • respond to several chemically unrelated families of antidepressants 6,7
  • frequently co-occur in individual patients 5,7
  • frequently co-aggregate in families. 7-9

We have published this evidence 6,7 and proposed that bulimia nervosa may be one form of a larger underlying disorder, which we termed “affective spectrum disorder.”

Antidepressants are often rapidly effective in treating bulimic symptoms, 10 regardless of whether patients exhibit depressive symptoms. Thus, there is no reason to withhold antidepressant therapy simply because a bulimic patient is not depressed. The term “antidepressant” may be a misnomer; these drugs are effective for numerous conditions, of which depression is only one.

Anorexic symptoms. Co-occurring depressive or anxiety disorders in a bulimic patient will not greatly alter treatment. The antidepressants and psychotherapies typically used to treat bulimia are often equally effective for affective disorders. Co-occurring anorexia nervosa, however, is a more serious concern.

Bulimic patients often display a history of anorexia nervosa; in many cases, the patient develops anorexia nervosa as a teenager and then progresses to bulimia nervosa across several years. Her prognosis is much better if her weight normalizes with the shift to bulimia nervosa, than if her weight remains well below normal for her height. It is unclear why medications and psychotherapy are much less effective in bulimic patients with anorexic symptoms than in those with bulimia alone. Watch for further details on anorexia nervosa as this series continues in future issues of.

Medical considerations. Potential medical complications—mostly consequences of vomiting or laxative use—are important to consider when you assess a bulimic patient: 1

  • The acid in vomitus may gradually erode tooth enamel, requiring dental consultation.
  • Vomitus may inflame salivary gland ducts, though the swelling is usually benign.
  • Frequent vomiting may result in hypokalemia and alkalosis, although aggressive medical treatment usually is not needed.

Ask about ipecac use. To induce vomiting, some patients may abuse ipecac syrup, which can cause cardiomyopathy. 11

Inpatient or outpatient? Unless the bulimic patient displays severe and medically dangerous anorexic symptoms, she can usually be treated as an outpatient. However, evaluate her carefully for suicidal ideation—which is not uncommon in bulimia nervosa—and consider inpatient treatment if necessary.

Medication vs. psychotherapy

The relative merits of medication versus psychotherapy in treating bulimia nervosa continue to be debated. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews includes meta-analyses of both drug therapy 12 and psychotherapy 13 for bulimia nervosa. The 2001 drug therapy review found that “the use of a single antidepressant agent was clinically effective,” with no one drug clearly superior to another. Notably, this review was published before recent findings on topiramate.

The corresponding 2002 review of psychotherapy concludes—somewhat more cautiously—that “there is a small body of evidence for the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy in bulimia nervosa and similar syndromes, but the quality of trials is very variable and sample sizes are often small.”

In bulimia nervosa and other psychiatric disorders, comparing psychotherapy with drug therapy is hazardous because several factors bias the comparison in favor of psychotherapy. These factors include an expectational effect, a responsibility effect, and differential generalizability of study results.

Expectational effect. Patients in clinical trials are aware that they are receiving psychotherapy and, presumably, that study investigators hope to demonstrate its efficacy. This might account for much of psychotherapy’s apparent effect, as even placebos can produce 30% to 50% improvement in bulimia. 14

Responsibility effect. If a patient fails to improve in a drug study, she will conclude that the drug has failed. But if she fails to improve in a psychotherapy study, she may conclude that she has failed. Because psychological treatments generally require patients to work in therapy, the patient may feel partially responsible for the outcome. Thus, to avoid cognitive dissonance, she may consciously or unconsciously exaggerate her improvement, both in her own mind and when reporting to treaters.

Differential generalizability. Psychological study protocols, such as administering several months of a behavioral treatment, usually mimic clinical practice fairly well. This is not the case with drug study protocols.

No responsible clinician would inflexibly administer a single dosage of a single drug for a fixed period to every bulimic patient and then declare failure for all nonresponders, as is done in study protocols. In practice, the clinician can offer nonresponders augmentation strategies and additional drug trials. Thus, calculations of bulimia response rates in drug studies substantially understate response to drug therapy in clinical practice.

Table 2

How effective are medications in treating bulimia nervosa?


Evidence for efficacy



Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors


Fluoxetine is only SSRI studied in controlled trials



Generally more side effects than SSRIs

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors


High rates of remission, but dietary restrictions



Only one controlled trial

Venlafaxine, mirtazapine, nefazodone


No controlled trials, but probably effective



Not recommended; caused seizures in bulimic patients




Only one controlled trial, but substantial effect size



Little efficacy in only controlled study



May be useful in bulimia with comorbid bipolar disorder



May be useful in bulimia with comorbid bipolar disorder

Other agents



Augmentation agent in patients with incomplete antidepressant response



Ineffective in only controlled trial; possible augmentation strategy



Ineffective in two controlled trials



One controlled trial

0 No apparent efficacy

+ Occasional effect; limited evidence

++ Clear effect; good evidence from controlled trial(s)

+++ Strongly documented effect; evidence from multiple controlled trials.

( ) Negative effect

One also might note that psychological study findings have not “sold” well in the clinical practice marketplace. For example, in a recent survey of more than 220 bulimic women treated with psychotherapy, only 6.9% said they received a full course of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) 14 —despite two decades of evidence of its efficacy. By contrast, untested, inefficacious, and possibly harmful psychotherapies for bulimia—including recovered-memory therapy—appear to be thriving.

Recommendation. Interpret with caution any head-to-head comparisons of psychological versus drug therapies—especially when clinical practice recommendations are made. Certain psychological therapies provided by specifically-trained individuals likely do help patients with bulimia nervosa. However, biases inherent to the studies may inflate psychological therapies’ efficacy when compared with that of drug therapy.

Therefore, for a psychiatrist who does not specialize in eating disorders to offer exclusively psychological therapy to a bulimic patient—while withholding or postponing drug therapy—may now be a questionable practice.

Choosing drug therapies

Although consensus is lacking on an optimal treatment trial sequence for bulimia nervosa, we suggest a rational approach based on the evidence and our experience (Algorithm).

First-line antidepressants. A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial is usually the first choice (Table 2), and some data suggest that higher-than-usual dosages may be required. For example, in a large multicenter trial of fluoxetine in bulimia nervosa, 60 mg/d was considerably more effective than 20 mg/d for reducing binge eating behavior and vomiting frequency. 15

Based on our observations, however, we believe that noncompliance or irregular compliance may account for this difference in response. Bulimic patients’ impulsive and obsessional behavior may keep them from taking their medications as prescribed. The higher fluoxetine dosage may therefore have been more effective simply because it ensured adequate plasma levels, even when patients missed or forgot multiple doses.

Augmenting agents. A first antidepressant trial rarely leads to complete remission of bulimic symptoms. This is not a serious concern, however, because many other options are available.

Liothyronine. Partial responders to SSRIs often become complete responders when we add a 10-day trial of liothyronine (T3), 25 μg/d. If this fails, we may try augmenting with lithium carbonate, although bulimic patients are often afraid of weight gain or lithium’s other side effects.

Topiramate. A newer augmentation strategy is to add the anticonvulsant topiramate. Used alone, topiramate demonstrated effectiveness for bulimia nervosa in one placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. 16

Adding topiramate to an antidepressant regimen will likely reduce any remaining bulimic symptoms. In addition, topiramate often produces weight loss—a side effect that bulimic patients usually welcome. It remains unclear whether topiramate’s weight-loss effects might pose a hazard in patients with simultaneous bulimic and anorexic symptoms.

Other antidepressants. If the above strategies fail, other antidepressant options include venlafaxine, tricyclics, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Bupropion is not recommended in bulimia nervosa; one trial 17 of this agent resulted in a much higher rate of grand mal seizures in bulimic patients than in patients taking bupropion for depression.

In bulimic patients with concomitant bipolar disorder, the anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproate often reduce affective and bulimic symptoms. By contrast, the anticonvulsant phenytoin—once thought to be useful in bulimia nervosa 10 —offers little benefit for either bulimic or affective symptoms.

Persistence is important when initial medication trials fail. One unblinded study followed 36 bulimic patients 9 to 19 months after they completed a controlled study with trazodone. 18 Of the 26 patients who tried a second or third antidepressant, 17 (65%) achieved remission of bulimia on follow-up. Of the 10 patients who declined a second or third trial, only 1 (10%) attained remission.

Notably, these study results were obtained before the SSRIs and other newer antidepressants or topiramate became available. Cooperative patients using present-day medications might be able to achieve remission rates that exceed 65%.

Algorithm Proposed treatment approach to bulimia nervosa

Table 3

How effective are psychotherapies in treating bulimia nervosa?


Evidence for efficacy


Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)


Controlled evidence for efficacy in individual and group treatment

Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)


Effective, but slower than CBT

Exposure with response prevention


May be added to other behavioral techniques, though additive benefit questionable

Dialectical behavior therapy


Highly structured behavioral technique originally developed for borderline personality disorder

Self-help groups


Frequently considered very helpful by patients

Psychodynamic psychotherapy


“Recovered memory” approaches are frankly harmful

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)


Dubious theoretical basis; no methodologically acceptable evidence for efficacy

0 No apparent efficacy

+ Occasional effect; limited evidence

++ Clear effect; good evidence from controlled trial(s)

+++ Strongly documented effect; evidence from multiple controlled trials.


Cognitive-behavioral therapy. CBT—given either individually or in groups—is the most effective psychotherapy for bulimia (Table 3). 19 CBT typically involves 3 to 6 months of helping the patient focus on her bulimic behaviors and on specific attitudes—such as unrealistic preoccupations with being “too fat”—that perpetuate the behaviors.

Did you miss this content?
Psychosis and catatonia after dancing with a dangerous partner