To Name :
To Email :
From Name :
From Email :
Comments :

Evidence-Based Reviews


Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder: Which therapies are most effective?

Do antidepressants help the patient or exacerbate treatment-refractory depression in the context of rapid-cycling bipolar disorder? Is lithium still not recommended? What is the evidence for divalproex and lamotrigine? When should you consider add-ons? The authors review which treatment approaches stand the best chance of success in your patients.

Vol. 1, No. 3 / March 2002

Patients with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) can be frustrating to treat. Despite growing research and data, knowledge and effective therapies remain limited. How do you manage patients with rapid cycling who do not respond robustly to lithium, divalproex, or carbamazepine monotherapy? Are combination therapies likely to be more effective? Where does lamotrigine fit in? Is there a role for conventional antidepressants?

We’ll explore these and related questions—but the final answers are not yet in. Recognition of RCBD is important because it presents such difficult treatment challenges. Available evidence does suggest that rapid cycling as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (Box 1), describes a clinically specific course of illness that may require treatments different from currently used traditional drug therapies for nonrapid cycling bipolar disorder, particularly as no one agent appears to provide ideal bimodal treatment and prophylaxis of this bipolar disorder variant.

Box 1

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF RAPID CYCLING

Rapid cycling is a specifier of the longitudinal course of illness presentation that is seen almost exclusively in bipolar disorder and is associated with a greater morbidity. Dunner and Fieve 1 originally coined the term when evaluating clinical factors associated with lithium prophylaxis failure. Since that time the validity of rapid cycling as a distinct course modifier for bipolar disorder has been supported by multiple studies, leading to its inclusion in the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the APA (1994).

According to DSM-IV, the course specifier of rapid cycling applies to “at least 4 episodes of a mood disturbance in the previous 12 months that meet criteria for a manic episode, a hypomanic episode, or a major depressive episode.” The episodes must be demarcated by a full or partial remission lasting at least 2 months or by a switch to a mood state of opposite polarity.

Early reports noted that patients suffering from RCBD did not respond adequately when treated with lithium. 1 Other observations indicated that divalproex was more effective in this patient population, particularly for the illness’ hypomanic or manic phases. 2 We hope that the following evaluation of these and other drug therapies will prove helpful.

Watch out for antidepressants

Most concerning has been the frequency and severity of treatment-refractory depressive phases of RCBD that may be exacerbated by antidepressant use (cycle induction or acceleration). Indeed, the frequent recurrence of refractory depression has been described as the hallmark of this bipolar disorder variant. 3

Lithium: the scale weighs against it

Although an excellent mood stabilizer for most patients with bipolar disorder, lithium monotherapy is less than ideal for patients with the rapid-cycling variant, particularly in treatment or prevention of depressive or mixed episodes. The efficacy of lithium is likely decreased by the concurrent administration of antidepressant medication and increased when administered with other mood stabilizers.

The landmark article by Dunner and Fieve, 1 which described a placebo-controlled, double-blind maintenance study in a general cohort of 55 patients, tried to clarify factors associated with the failure of lithium prophylaxis in bipolar disorder. Rapid cyclers comprised 20% of the subjects and 80% were nonrapid cyclers. Rapid cyclers were disproportionately represented in the lithium failure group. Lithium failures included 82% (9 of 11) of rapid cyclers compared to 41% (18 of 44) of nonrapid cyclers. Lithium failure was defined as (1) hospitalization for, or (2) treatment of, mania or (3) depression during lithium therapy, or as mood symptoms that, as documented by rating scales, were sufficient to warrant a diagnosis of mild depression, hypomania, or mania persisting for at least 2 weeks.

Kukopulos et al 4 replicated the findings of Dunner and Fieve in a study of the longitudinal clinical course of 434 bipolar patients. Of these patients, 50 were rapid cyclers and had received continuous lithium therapy for more than a year, with good to partial prophylaxis in only 28%. Maj and colleagues 5 published a 5-year prospective study of lithium therapy in 402 patients with bipolar disorder and noted the absence of rapid cycling in good responders to lithium but an incidence rate of 26% in nonresponders to lithium.

Other investigators have reported better response in RCBD. In a select cohort of lithium-responsive bipolar I and II patients, Tondo et al 6 concluded that lithium maintenance yields striking long-term reductions in depressive and manic morbidity, more so in rapid cycling type II patients. This study, however, was in a cohort of lithium responders and excluded patients who had been exposed to antipsychotic or antidepressant medications for more than 3 months, those on chronic anticonvulsant therapy, and those with substance abuse disorders.

Although most studies do report poor response to lithium therapy in RCBD, Wehr and colleagues 7 suggest that in some patients with rapid cycling, the discontinuation of antidepressant drugs may allow lithium to act as a more effective anticycling mood-stabilizing agent.

Divalproex: effective in manic phase

In contrast to lithium, an open trial of a homogenous cohort of patients with RCBD by Calabrese and colleagues3,8 found divalproex to possess moderate to marked acute and prophylactic antimanic properties with only modest antidepressant effects (Table 1). Data from 6 open studies involving 147 patients with rapid cycling suggest that divalproex possesses moderate to marked efficacy in the manic phase, but poor to moderate efficacy in the depressed phase. Positive outcome predictors were bipolar II and mixed states, no prior lithium therapy, and a positive family history of affective disorder. Predictors of negative response included increase in frequency and severity of mania, and borderline personality disorder.

Divalproex therapy in combination with lithium may improve response rates. 9 Calabrese and colleagues, however, have examined large cohorts of patients, including those comorbid with alcohol, cocaine, and/or cannabis abuse, treated with a lithium-divalproex combination over 6-month study periods. The researchers found that only 25% to 50% of patients stabilized, and that of those not exhibiting a response, the majority (75%) did not respond because of treatment-refractory depression in the context of RCBD. 3

Although experts believe divalproex to be more effective than lithium in preventing episodes associated with RCBD, such a conclusion awaits confirmation with the near completion of a double-blind, 20-month maintenance trial sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).

Carbamazepine’s role in combination therapy

Early reports by Post and colleagues in 1987 suggested that rapid cycling predicted positive response to carbamazepine, but later findings by Okuma in 1993 refuted this. Other collective open and controlled studies suggest that this anticonvulsant possesses moderate to marked efficacy in the manic phase, and poor to moderate efficacy in the depressed phase of RCBD. Again, combination therapy with lithium may offer greater efficacy. Of significance, carbamazepine treatment outcomes have not been prospectively evaluated in a homogeneous cohort of rapid cyclers.

The limitations of carbamazepine therapy are well known and available evidence also does not seem to support monotherapy with this agent as being useful in RCBD, especially in the treatment and prophylaxis of depressive or mixed phases of the disorder. Thus, further controlled studies are needed to examine the agent’s potential role and safety in combination therapies for RCBD.

Table 1

SPECTRUM OF ACUTE AND PROPHYLACTIC EFFICACY OF DIVALPROEX IN RAPID-CYCLING BIPOLAR DISORDER

Spectrum of marked responses to divalproex in bipolar rapid cycling

 

Acute

Prophylactic

Dysphoric hypomania/mania

87%

89%

Elated hypomania/mania

64%

77%

Depression (n = 101, mean follow-up 15 months)

21%

38%

Adapted from Calabrese and Delucchi. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147:431-434 and Calabrese et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993;13:280-283.

Lamotrigine: best hope for monotherapy

Lamotrigine monotherapy has been reported to be effective in some RCBD cases. The data suggest that it possesses both antidepressant and mood-stabilizing properties. 10

An open, naturalistic study of 5 women with treatment-refractory rapid cycling by Fatemi et al 11 demonstrated both mood-stabilizing and antidepressant effects from lamotrigine monotherapy or augmentation at a mean dose of 185 ±33.5 mg/d. In 14 clinical reports involving 207 patients with bipolar disorder, 66 of whom had rapid cycling, lamotrigine was observed to possess moderate to marked efficacy in depression and hypomania, but only moderate efficacy in mania.

An open, prospective study compared the efficacy of lamotrigine add-on or monotherapy in 41 rapid cyclers to 34 nonrapid cyclers across 48 weeks. Improvement from baseline to last visit was significant between both subgroups for depressive and hypomanic symptoms. Patients presenting with more severe manic symptoms did less well. 13

In the first double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine in RCBD, 12 182 of 324 patients with rapid cycling responded to treatment with open-label lamotrigine and were then randomized to the study’s double-blind phase. Forty-one percent of lamotrigine-treated vs. 26% of placebo-treated patients were stable without relapse during 6 months of monotherapy. Patients with rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder consistently experienced more improvement than their bipolar I counterparts (Figure 1). The results of this only prospective, placebo-controlled, acute-treatment study of rapid-cycling bipolar patients to date indicate that lamotrigine monotherapy is useful for some patients with RCBD, particularly those with bipolar II.

Frye et al 14 conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 23 patients with rapid cycling utilizing a crossover series of three 6-week monotherapy evaluations of lamotrigine, gabapentin, and placebo. Marked antidepressant response on lamotrigine was seen in 45% of the participants compared with 19% of patients on placebo and a similar response rate among those on gabapentin.

A study evaluating the safety and efficacy of 2 dosages of lamotrigine (50 mg/d or 200 mg/d) compared with placebo in the treatment of a major depressive episode in patients with bipolar I disorder over 7 weeks demonstrated significant antidepressant efficacy. 15 These bipolar outpatients displayed clinical improvement as early as the third week of treatment, and switch rates for both dosages did not exceed that of placebo. Patients with RCBD, however, were excluded from this initial trial. Subsequent studies have demonstrated similar magnitudes of efficacy in patients with RCBD, primarily in the prevention of depressive episodes, including the 6-month RCBD maintenance study 10 and 2 recently completed 18-month maintenance studies of patients with bipolar I disorder, either recently manic or recently depressed.

Lamotrigine thus may have a special role in RCBD treatment. Its most significant side effect in bipolar disorder is benign rash, which has occurred in 9.0% (108 of 1,198) of patients randomized to lamotrigine vs. 7.6% (80 of 1,056) of those randomized to placebo in pivotal multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled bipolar trials.

In mood disorder trials conducted to date, the rate of serious rash, defined as requiring both drug discontinuation and hospitalization, has been 0.06% (2 of 3,153) on lamotrigine and 0.09% (1 out of 1,053) on placebo. No cases of Steven’s Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis were observed. 16 A low starting dose and gradual titration of lamotrigine (Table 2) appear to minimize the risk of serious rash.

Levothyroxine: possible add-on therapy

Levothyroxine should be considered as add-on therapy in patients with known hypothyroidism, borderline hypothyroidism, or otherwise treatment-refractory cases.

The strategy of thyroid supplementation is derived from Gjessing’s 1936 report of success in administering hypermetabolic doses of thyroid hormone to patients with periodic catatonia. Stancer and Persad 17 initially reported the potential efficacy of this therapeutic maneuver in rapid cyclers; remissions were induced by hypermetabolic thyroid doses in 5 of 7 patients with treatment-refractory bipolar disorder. No data currently support any prophylactic efficacy of thyroid supplementation monotherapy for RCBD treatment.

Bauer and Whybrow 18 suggest that thyroid supplementation with T4 added to mood stabilizers augments efficacy independent of pre-existing thyroid function. The potential side effects of long-term levothryoxine administration, namely osteoporosis and cardiac arrhythmias, limit the usefulness of thyroid augmentation in RCBD.

Atypical antipsychotics: perhaps in combination

Coadministering atypical antipsychotics in other mood stabilizers may help rapid cyclers with current or past psychotic symptoms during their mood episodes, but further study is clearly needed.

Atypical antipsychotic medications may have specific mood-stabilizing properties, particularly in the management of mixed and manic states. In the first prospective trial of clozapine monotherapy in bipolar disorder, Calabrese and colleagues in 1994 reported that rapid cycling did not appear to predict nonresponse to treatment.

Continued...
Did you miss this content?
Depressed and sick with ‘nothing to live for’