For Residents

Reducing the likelihood that a patient will be readmitted: A resident's perspective

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Over the past year, as a part of a treat­ment team, I encountered many dis­charged patients who did not heed their physician’s instructions—be it rehabili­tation advice, follow-up appointments, or adherence to a drug regimen. Consequently, these patients found themselves back in the inpatient unit a few days later. A cycle of admission−discharge−readmission began for them.

I have witnessed conflicting emotions on the part of the staff (nurses and residents) toward these patients. Some staff are empa­thetic to their needs; others see the recurrent admissions as a ruse to find food and shelter and get attention.

In this article, I explore several aspects of this behavioral pattern and possible reasons for it, and describe the staff’s reaction to a returning patient in one case.


CASE REPORT Depressed and heavily intoxicated
Mr. R, age 35, with a history of major depres­sive disorder and nonadherence to treat­ment, is brought to the emergency room (ER) by emergency medical services because he is heavily intoxicated (blood alcohol level, >200 mg/dL). Mr. R has had 4 admissions to the inpatient psychiatry unit in the past 6 months, including 2 in the past 30 days.

After a few hours’ stay in the ER, Mr. R’s blood alcohol level drops to <100 mg/dL. He is being prepared for discharge to follow-up with outpatient psychiatric services when he begins complaining of chest pain. A cardiac workup is negative; he is again prepared for discharge when he begins reporting sui­cidal ideation, with a plan to jump in front of traffic.

Mr. R is admitted to the inpatient psychia­try unit.

During Mr. R’s hospitalization, he admits that he lied about being suicidal because he recently lost his job and is homeless and in dire need of food and shelter. He stays in the inpatient unit for 6 days.


An unexpected ‘adverse reaction’
During the hospital stay, staff members, who initially were concerned about Mr. R’s condition, underwent a striking transfor­mation in their attitude toward the patient once his suicidal ideation was exposed as a hoax: They became less receptive to his needs.

The staff’s experience with Mr. R also altered their approach to other patients, who were put under unnecessary scrutiny in response to heightened suspicion of feigned illness—a classic case of “once bitten, twice shy.” The staff felt betrayed by Mr. R’s false claim of being suicidal.

Furthermore, I noticed self-doubt creep­ing into the minds of the residents who had admitted Mr. R. Consequently, they advocated that he should be discharged patients of an acute care bed.

The attending physicians and other mem­bers of the staff remained compassionate toward the patient, however; instead of con­demning him, they tried to understand the root cause of why he sought admission: Was it nonadherence with his medication regi­men? Substance abuse? Social issues? These staff members were opposed to discharg­ing Mr. R because they believed that forced discharge would encourage him to further manipulate the system—and he would be back in the ER.


CASE CONCLUDED
The medical team concludes that it is prudent to prepare a well-thought-out discharge plan for Mr. R. He is allowed to remain as an inpa­tient until his social issues are addressed; he is plugged into the rehabilitation program for his alcohol addiction, with a plan for close out­patient psychiatry follow-up.

One year later, Mr. R has not been admit­ted again.


How to tackle shortcomings of the system
Because of changing hospital policies, an acute shortage of psychiatry inpatient beds, and the reluctance of insurance companies to reimburse for an extended stay, these beds are often hurriedly evacuated and patients are discharged prematurely to make room for acutely ill patients.1 Such policies can lead to failure to reach a therapeutic medi­cation dosage or establish an appropriate disposition plan. Patients might relapse and find their way back to the inpatient unit.

Even though this is a system—not a personal—shortcoming, these patients are viewed negatively and are unwelcome when they return to the hospital. Notably, longer hospital stays do not necessarily lead to better care or fewer readmissions. Patients who have a longer length of stay are, in fact, sicker and have inadequate community and social support.1,2

After a year’s experience as a psychiatry resident, I came to understand that, before discharging a patient from the inpatient unit, a resident should pose a few questions to himself (herself), including:
• What is the likelihood that the patient will adhere to his (her) medication regimen?
• Where is the patient going to get his medications? Will he (she) be able to pay for them?
• Does he have a substance use disorder?
• Have the patient’s personal circum­stances changed since he was admit­ted? If so, how?

Pages

Recommended Reading

Medicare at 50: Physicians struggle with antifraud regulations
MDedge Psychiatry
Senators prep for Supreme Court strike down of federal subsidies
MDedge Psychiatry
More physicians support Democratic candidates
MDedge Psychiatry
VIDEO: Compliance plans, education can help physicians prevent Medicare fraud involvement
MDedge Psychiatry
Defending direct pay: Psychiatrists say model works
MDedge Psychiatry
Good medical care for psychiatric patients is imperative
MDedge Psychiatry
HIMSS15: Doctors can develop patient engagement platforms through strong partnerships
MDedge Psychiatry
New state litigation challenges physicians’ authority to regulate nonphysicians
MDedge Psychiatry
AMWA: Practicing positive thinking, gratitude can raise physician satisfaction
MDedge Psychiatry
Medicare at 50: Or, the end of fee-for-service
MDedge Psychiatry

Related Articles